Conceived in the wake of Columbine and completed in 2001, Zero Day sat on a shelf for two years before it saw the light of day. Something happened in the fall of 2001, on some date I can never quite remember despite the gnawing sensation that we, as a nation, swore never to forget. In any case, The Event (whatever it was) panicked Zero Day's distributors into canceling the film's release. Undeterred, writer/director Ben Coccio used the time to do what all serious creative people do with their stalled projects: tinker. The result gained a limited release in 2003. The fact that I only heard about this film last week should tell you just how "limited." I like to believe that, even in the War Fever of 2003, I would've noticed a school shooting movie opening up down the street. Yet, in the course of researching my next novel (goddamn that feels good to type) I've discovered three from that year alone. (Thanks, Variety--you industry rag, you). So here we are, with the first.

A pseudo-documentary from the post-Blair Witch wave, Zero Day, is another testament to the effective use of limited resources. Like a good insurgency, it turns its weaknesses into strengths, luring the viewer into a subjective, cinematic Venus flytrap with its hyper-realist atmosphere, achieved without professional actors or equipment. Coccio goes so far as to cast real teenagers and real families in this, and while I'll argue that the film is decidedly ambiguous, and take it to task for, I believe the technical term is, "pussying out," I want salute the film's hypnotic effectiveness right off the bat.

There. Done. Now, the summation.

Except there's little need for a summation. You've all heard this before. In broad terms, Zero Day purports to be the last (video) will and testament of two teenage murderers: Cal Gabriel (Calvin Robertson) and Andre Kriegman (Andre Keuck). The film follows Our Anti-heroes, who introduce themselves to the camera as "the Army of Two," through a year of meticulous planning as they prepare to, in Andre's words, "shoot the school."

Practically, this amounts to a whole lot of one "Army" member talking to another, who stands behind the camera, simultaneously participating, directing, and viewing. The whole film is, in effect, a first-person shooter, so much so that at times it threatens to give me an irony embolism. Andre showcases the "supply depot" in his closet, which includes fake IDs, waterproof fuses, and Mexican .22 caliber bullets. The boys light 4th of July Fireworks, officially declaring war. They egg a hated jock's house, build pipe bombs in their rooms, chose targets down in the basement, and steal their cousin's gun collection.

This is their "series of missions followed by a final, big ass mission," which they call Zero Day. Yet the camera that records their testimonials and how-to videos also records Andre's birthday party, the removal of Cal's braces, a weekend shooting expedition with Andre's cousin, and Cal's stroll through a graveyard with a reasonably hot chick (Rachel Benichak). Normal, mid-American teenage life. Yet Cal and Andre never interact meaningfully with anyone else. Their conversations with parents and peers are superficial at best, stuck in the shadow cast by their plan. Despite the fact neither boy mentions killing people until the thirty minute mark, their action has a specific gravity, warping everything around them, including the film.

"It's gonna be unreal," Cal tells us. "It's gonna be...beautiful...I'm starring right at you. Through the tape...and right at you...We're gonna leave you all behind. Just sticks in the mud that Andre and I create, and we're gonna walk away. See we, we...we see more than you do." And so they do. That's the film's peculiar misfortune. Ben Coccio's written (with his brother Christopher) a tight little horror show here, as methodical as its protagonists. Its atmosphere of creeping doom might keep you watching, but don't expect to take anything away from Zero Day. This film preaches no messages, offers no morals, puts forth no solutions, and is damn skimpy with its reasons. Cal and Andre never pause to justify themselves except in the most abstract terms. "Life isn't fair," Andre says, (unconsciously?) echoing his father, "so we gotta even the score a little."

This amounts to an abstraction of our protagonists, Andre and Cal, who remain permanently distanced from we, the audience, despite the fact that the entire movie takes place from their perspective. We are within, but not of that perspective, and as such, don't share in it. Frankly, I feel a little cheated. I expected at least one adrenaline-fueled rant against "the world." So-called "nu-metal" bands have elevated this to a high art, and we prose stylists had better catch up to our more poetic siblings before they grind the subject into irrelevancy. Coccio's erudite script prepared me for at least some kind of Final Word on the subject.

Too bad for me. There's no hint of that here, no high horses propping up Zero Day's ass. Cussio, on the DVD commentary, says, "Even though I don't propose any reason why and I am obviously coming from these guys', these two characters' perspective, and I am trying to make them watchable, I in no way want to make someone who would do something like this necessarily sympathetic. That's an impossible task anyway." Perhaps, Ben. But perhaps you lacked the courage to figure out your main character's motivations. Fearful of "identifying" or "sympathizing" with your "monsters," you've gone and demonized them, reducing them, and their actions, with your narrative distance. The Army of Two made its choice before the movie even begins. Can we then expect some kind of prequel soon, Ben? Can I call you Ben?

Ben, you got a great set-up here, but it's not really a story. By making this a "how done it" you've refused to address the (much more interesting for my money) question of "why done it", depriving me of the opportunity to skewer you for your answer. Instead, I'll skewer you for your non-answer, which is tantamount to equating school shootings with any other everyday Act of God. Zero Day informs us that we'll never know the "whyfors" of such events, a view that I (for personal reasons) must take issue with.

You see, Ben, these events are not driven by anonymous forces. Scratch the surface of any of them and you'll find a human being, making a decision conceived in darkness and dedicated to the proposition that all high school students will be equal in death. Cal comes closest to articulating this when he discusses the futility of suicide over his sitar. "Why would anyone just kill themselves?" He and Andre see going out with a (literal) bang as the only alternative. "I'm coming out in a black plastic bag," Cal tells us. Baseless at best and self-indulgent at worst, the Army of Two paint a picture of a complete hopelessness. For them, staging a massacre-suicide really is the best possible solution. How did they reach this point in their emotional lives? What forces moved within them, as opposed to around them? The question seems too controversial for Coccio in particular, and American filmmakers in general. But I can't shake the feeling that an answer lies somewhere in that safety deposit box full of tapes the Army of Two sets up for themselves, "so mommy won't find them under the bed."

I suppose teenage ennui is as good a motive as any; fits right in with the adolescent air of the proceedings, along the boy's self-conscious militarism. "That's why we're the Army of Two," Andre says, "not the Group of Assholes with Guns." It would've been nice to see some of this army's propaganda...but, then again, it might've been nice to see some footage from an outside source...like the video of Cal's trip to the Prom, shot from some unknown's perspective, which inexplicable appears at the hour mark, as the film begins to break free of its subjects. What, did someone's Prom tape get accidentally mixed in with the rest of the Zero Day diary?

Perhaps a few more "Cal got beat up stories," a few more incidents of teenage violence, and a wider exploration of the environment these two boy's destroy (their school and town, say) would've turned this from a merely effective movie into a good movie. Perhaps, hell. It could've worked, if Ben Coccio had only possessed a little bit more balls.

That aside, what am I saying, "merely effective"? Capably acted and well edited by a man who already has more balls than sense, Zero Day is a perfectly made little movie, which disserves more attention that it gets. Awful as in "awe-full" (and not the pejorative "awful" we see so often around here), Zero Day is a real horror movie, disserving of the full horror movie treatment, rabid internet fans and all. Its evil is banal, its horror painstakingly ordinary, and its final scenes a shock, not for their content, so much as their character. Simultaneously conceived at the wrong and right time, Zero Day could've been a contender, and still can.